Core Curriculum Verification Register
Core Curriculum Verification Register
All 65 claim-level curriculum pages were reviewed line by line on 2026-09-02. Claim-bearing prose, definitions, and comparison tables were checked against the primary or official references defined on each page. Exercises, design prompts, and acceptance criteria were classified as instructions rather than factual claims. Every Mermaid block was checked for agreement with its surrounding explanation and cited concepts.
Method
- Inventory every core page carrying the claim-level fact-check scope.
- Separate externally verifiable claims from exercises, local inventory observations, and explicitly labeled design guidance.
- Narrow or correct unsupported, universal, or obsolete wording.
- Add inline source markers adjacent to material claims and direct reference definitions on the same page.
- Recheck changing specifications and official product documentation as of 2026-09-02.
- Compare every Mermaid node and edge with the described process; record the semantic-review date below each diagram.
A marker count is a mechanical count of [S1] and [S2] occurrences, not a count of unique claims. “Semantic reviews” must equal “Mermaid blocks.” Agentctl output was used as a secondary challenge pass and source-discovery aid, never as evidence by itself.
Register
Totals
- Pages: 65
- Inline
[S1]/[S2]marker occurrences: 2350 - Mermaid blocks: 68
- Recorded semantic reviews: 68
The authoritative source list and dated API/framework checks are maintained in the source ledger. Legacy files are tracked separately in the legacy fact-check matrix.