AI Incidents and Change Management
AI Incidents and Change Management
Key jargon
| Term | Plain-language meaning |
|---|---|
| Incident | An event that harms or threatens users, systems, data, compliance, or service objectives. |
| Containment | Immediate action limiting an incident's reach or impact. |
| Root cause | The underlying conditions that allowed the incident, beyond its visible symptom. |
| Post-incident review | A structured analysis producing evidence, lessons, owners, and corrective actions. |
Key concepts
- AI incidents can originate in models, prompts, data, retrieval, tools, providers, policy, or human workflow.
- Preserve evidence and version identity before changing the system, then convert findings into regression tests.
Concept map
flowchart LR
A["Detect and classify incident"] --> B["Contain and preserve evidence"]
B --> C["Recover known-good service"]
C --> D["Learn and add regression case"]Incident classes
Sensitive disclosure, harmful or unauthorized effect, prompt injection, poisoned retrieval, model/provider outage, severe quality regression, runaway cost, policy bypass, data-rights issue, or misleading high-impact decision.
Response
- Stop or reduce affected capability.
- Preserve run, model, prompt, retrieval, tool, identity, and effect evidence.
- Revoke credentials or tool authority where needed.
- Determine affected users/data/actions.
- Roll back the complete versioned system.
- Notify required owners and stakeholders.
- Add representative regression tests before re-release.
Exercise
Tabletop a retrieval assistant citing a poisoned document. Define detection, containment, corpus rollback, affected-answer search, user communication, and new evaluation cases.