Verification, Citations, and Abstention

Verification, Citations, and Abstention

Fact-check status

Reviewed claim by claim on 2026-09-02 against the primary or official sources identified inline as S1 and S2. Recommendations are design guidance unless a cited standard makes them normative.

Key jargon

Term Plain-language meaning
Verification Checking a claim against evidence or an executable test. S1
Citation A pointer to the source supporting a specific claim. S1
Abstention Explicitly declining to assert an answer when evidence is insufficient. S1
Calibration How well expressed confidence matches actual correctness. S1

Key concepts

Concept map

flowchart LR
    A["Identify important claims"] --> B["Trace each to evidence"]
    B --> C["Test where possible"]
    C --> D["Accept correct or abstain"]

Diagram semantics verified against S1 and S2 on 2026-09-02.

Verification ladder

Risk Appropriate check
Low-stakes wording Human read-through S1
Structured extraction Schema and sample comparison S1
Factual research Open cited sources and verify claim support S1
Calculation Recompute with deterministic code or calculator S1
Code Review, tests, lint, and isolated execution S1
High-stakes advice Qualified human and current authoritative guidance S1
External action Preview, permission check, confirmation, and audit record S1

A citation is useful only if it exists, is authoritative enough, is current enough, and directly supports the nearby claim. Citation quantity is not evidence quality. S1

Abstention contract

Tell the system when to say: S1

Exercise

Ask for five claims about a topic you know. Require claim-level citations, then open each source and label it supported, partially supported, or unsupported.