Repeatable User Workflows
Repeatable User Workflows
Key jargon
| Term | Plain-language meaning |
|---|---|
| Workflow | A defined sequence of steps that transforms an input into an outcome. |
| Template | A reusable structure for instructions, context, and output. |
| Checkpoint | A saved intermediate artifact that supports review or recovery. |
| Feedback loop | A process that uses observed results to improve the next run. |
Key concepts
- Repeatability comes from explicit inputs, stages, artifacts, and checks—not from copying one long prompt.
- Intermediate artifacts make errors local, reviewable, and recoverable.
Concept map
flowchart LR
A["Capture input"] --> B["Run defined stages"]
B --> C["Review checkpoints"]
C --> D["Deliver and improve template"]Common patterns
| Pattern | Flow |
|---|---|
| Draft–critique–revise | Produce draft → check against rubric → revise |
| Extract–validate | Extract JSON → schema check → human sample review |
| Research–reconcile | Gather sources → compare claims → flag conflict → synthesize |
| Plan–execute–verify | Approve plan → perform bounded steps → test result |
| Route–specialize | Classify request → choose prompt/model/tool → consolidate |
Workflow card
Record purpose, trigger, inputs, sensitive fields, prompt version, model, tools, expected output, checks, approval points, failure behavior, owner, and review date.
Exercise
Take one repeated weekly task. Create a workflow card and run it twice with different inputs. Note which instructions are stable and which belong to the current case.
Stop rule
Do not automate an unclear process. Automation amplifies ambiguity, stale assumptions, and excessive permissions.