Context Engineering for Users
Context Engineering for Users
Key jargon
| Term | Plain-language meaning |
|---|---|
| Context engineering | Selecting, organizing, and maintaining the information supplied to an AI system. |
| Relevance | How directly a piece of context helps answer the current question. |
| Provenance | Where information came from and how it can be checked. |
| Context budget | The limited token capacity allocated among instructions, history, evidence, and output. |
Key concepts
- More context is not automatically better; useful context is relevant, trustworthy, current, and structured.
- Treat retrieved or pasted content as evidence, not as higher-priority instructions.
Concept map
flowchart LR
A["Gather candidate context"] --> B["Filter by relevance and trust"]
B --> C["Structure within budget"]
C --> D["Generate with provenance"]Context engineering is the work of placing the right information, instructions, examples, tool descriptions, and state into a model call.
Context stack
- Stable role and policy.
- Current task and acceptance criteria.
- Relevant user or project state.
- Selected source material.
- Available tools and their limits.
- Recent results and unresolved questions.
Quality rules
- Prefer a small relevant passage over an entire archive.
- Label source, date, and trust level.
- Separate instructions from quoted or retrieved content.
- Summarize older conversation state into explicit decisions and open items.
- Remove secrets and unrelated personal data.
- Test whether deleting a context item changes the answer.
Exercise
Give a model three short source passages, one irrelevant passage, and a question. Run once with all four and once with only the relevant three. Compare accuracy, citations, and wasted tokens.
Misconception
A larger context window is capacity, not guaranteed comprehension or recall.